Sports is lousy with division and parity these days
In terms of excitement, golf is stagnant.
The scene still depends on a player who is no longer the player that created
that energy to begin with. Woods still makes ratings jump, but he's rarely
jumping into contention.
But where this diversity is especially
relevant is at the axis of golf, the PGA Tour, or post-Tiger-mania PGA Tour.
The situation was exemplified by the recent Masters. The game's "Big
Three," i.e. Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer and Gary Player, were easily the
most enchanting players at Augusta National Titleist 712 AP2 Irons in April. Problem was, they were
just ceremonial starters.
Sports is lousy with division and parity
these days. The eighth-place Los Angeles Kings are in the Stanley Cup Finals,
the 9-7 New York Giants won the Super Bowl, and the 2011 Cardinals — with the
eighth best record in baseball — slipped in the back door to win a World
Series.
Once the actual tournament began, things
settled back into a more anonymous, diluted state. Coming off his first victory
in 30 months, Tiger Woods offered up his worst performance as a professional at
Augusta and
tied for 40th. Bubba Watson won the tournament, but hardly won the ratings.
Viewership was down 22 percent from a year earlier.
But the camera will continue to follow
Woods until someone steps forward to hog the headlines. Mickelson will be 42 in
June. He has carved out a place on the radar, but it's not going to grow any
larger. Vijay Singh is 49, done winning majors. Ernie Els ... please.
Bubba's breakthrough continues a trend.
After Woods won the Battle of Wounded Knee at Torrey Pines in 2008, and then
took the year off, Padraig Harrington lifted the environment by capturing two
majors in succession. Since, there has been 13 majors won by 13 different
players. Two of the 13, Phil Mickelson and Titleist 712 AP1 Irons Angel Cabrera, had won a major
previously. None of the 13 have won another.
But parity has a flip side. If Cinderella
gets to the ball every time, it's not special. You need a sinister, prevailing
stepmother for the fairy tale to happen. With parity, there is no David and
Goliath, no Bronx Bombers, no Big Machine. There are only Davids, bombers and
machines. The capital-letter attrition alone is alarming.
Watson now becomes the flavor of the week.
He joins Rory McIlroy, Charles Scwartzel, Graeme McDowell, Martin Kaymer and
even Harrington as players the golf press props up to fill the void. People got
especially carried away with McIlroy, suggesting he had the perfect swing,
perfect disposition and perfect opportunity to take the reins.
The PGA Tour is 22 events into the season
and has 20 different winners. Last year, for the first time since 1991, as few
as two wins paced the circuit. The anything-can-happen, anyone-can-win element
is nice. But without predictability, you have no favorites, no upsets, no
antagonists, no protagonists, no color, no romance. You have indifference.
The former No. 1 is now No. 7, approaching
his 36th birthday and officially injury prone. He has been absent or missed the
cut at six of the last 14 majors, finished 23rd or worse in three of the last
four.
Look back at the history of the game. From
Harry Vardon to Walter Hagen, Bobby Jones to Gene Sarazen, Byron Nelson to Sam
Snead and Ben Hogan, Palmer to Nicklaus and Player, and then Tom Watson.
Sprinkle Lee Trevino, Billy Casper, Johnny Miller, Raymond Floyd and Seve
Ballesteros among them.
To be fair, he does have the perfect
ancestry, but since winning the U.S. Open last year, McIlroy is an imperfect 0
for three in the majors. Don't misunderstand; McIlroy is a terrific talent and
just 23. There is every reason to believe he will win discount golf clubs many more tournaments,
even more majors. But to this point, he's not unlike like Schwartzel, Watson,
McDowell, Trevor Immelman and others. All moved to the head of the class but
stopped raising their hands.
